Lexical-Semantic Field "Moving Forward" in English Business Discourse

Authors

  • Elena I. Madinyan Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2021-40-4-520-533

Keywords:

collocations, lexico-semantic field, linguopragmatics, business discourse

Abstract

. Collocations play an important role during meetings and business negotiations of English-speaking companies, as they allow you to convey information concisely and clearly. In the scientific literature, collocations of the lexico-semantic field "moving forward" are observed from the standpoint of combinatorial, syntactic and lexico-semantic features. However, their role in the linguopragmatic aspect is poorly studied, in the field of business relations in particular. The purpose of this research is to study the lexical-semantic and linguopragmatic aspects of collocations, including the semantics of lexical units and the features of their functioning in business discourse. There are the following methods employed in the article: continuous sampling, systematization, interpretation, as well as lexical-semantic and linguopragmatic analysis. Special attention is paid to the study of the functions performed by the collocations in business discourse. The four most common microfields that constitute the lexico-semantic field "moving forward" have been identified: the microfield "to go", the microfield "rise", the microfield "moving forward with elements of the game" and the microfield "moving forward with the use of brute force". Systematization of collocations within microfields allows for a more detailed semantic analysis taking into account the semantic expression of collocations of the lexical-semantic field under study. The main functions of collocations included in lexical-semantic field "moving forward" are informative, expressive, appellative and evaluative. There is also a tendency for collocations to perform several functions simultaneously in business discourse. The theoretical and practical significance of the article lies in the fact that it contributes to the field of lexical semantics and linguopragmatics and its results can be reflected in collocation dictionaries, as well as in teaching English to students and while conducting corporate English trainings. The obtained results contribute to the development of the theory of lexico-semantic field and linguopragmatics.

Author Biography

Elena I. Madinyan, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Assistant, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Economics, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

References

Баранов А.Н., Добровольский Д.О. 2013. Основы фразеологии. М., ФЛИНТА, Наука, 312 с.

Белякова Н.С. 2017. Лексико-семантические поля экономических терминов (на материале англоязычного учебно-академического текста). Огарев-online, 10 (99). (Режим доступа: http://journal.mrsu.ru/arts/leksiko-semanticheskie-polya-ekonomicheskix-terminov-na-materiale-angloyazychnogo-uchebno-akademicheskogo-teksta (дата обращения: 23.03.2021).

Ваганова А.К. 2018. Концепт "движение" как компонент национальной картины мира в рассказе А.П. Чехова "Мечты". Научная мысль Кавказа, 3 (95): 73–79. DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-2018-95-3-73-79

Дранко В.В. 2006. Лингвистическая прагматика и теория речевых актов как научный метод: интерпретация косвенных вопросов. Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 3: Филология, 2: 191–205.

Малёв А.В., Мосалова А.И. 2013. Лингвопрагматический подход как методическая основа формирования профессиональной межкультурной компетенции. Русистика, 2: 114–120.

Малюга Е.Н. 2020. Функции юмора в англоязычном экономическом дискурсе. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9: Филология, 6: 31–43.

Мартынова Ю.А. 2008. Метафора в современном политическом дискурсе. Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Социология. Политология, 1: 125–129.

Медведева С.Н. 2019. Метафорические проекции глаголов движения в английском языке. Гипотеза, 3(8): 37–42.

Митина Е.А. 2010. К вопросу о структуре лексико-семантического поля «Смерть». Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета, 12: 291–302.

Попова З.Д., Стернин И.А. 2010. Лексическая система языка: внутренняя организация, категориальный аппарат и приемы описания. Москва, URSS, 171 с.

Сентенберг И.В. 1984. Лексическая семантика английского глагола. М., Изд-во МГПИ им. В.И. Ленина, 96 с.

Тамбовцева К.Д. 2014. Лексико-семантические поля молодежного американского сленга. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика, 3: 139–147.

Томалин Б., Малюга Е.Н. 2016. Деловой английский в век глобализации. Вопросы прикладной лингвистики, 24: 7–18.

Чудинов А.П. 2003. Метафорическая мозаика в современной политической коммуникации. Екатеринбург, Урал. гос. пед. ун-т, 248 с.

Crystal D. 2010. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press, 524 p.

Alba-Juez L. 2018. Emotion and appraisal processes in language: How are they related? In Gómez González. The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction. Eds. Mª de los Ángeles & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. Amsterdam, JohnBenjamins: 227–250

Kuzhevskaya E.B. 2019. Politeness strategies in business English discourse. Training. Language and Culture, 3(4): 36–46. DOI: 10.29366/2019tlc.3.4.4

Maluyga Е.N., Aleksandrova О.V. 2020. Linguopragmatic aspect of idiomatic expressions in English business discourse. TILTM. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. Future Academy: 1–6.

Malyuga E. & McCarthy M. 2018. English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 135: 39–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.011

McGee P. 2019. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Training, Language and Culture, 3(1): 73–84. DOI: 10.29366/2019tlc.3.1.5

Murashova E.P. 2021. The role of the cognitive metaphor in the hybridisation of marketing and political discourses: An analysis of English-language political advertising. Training, Language and Culture, 5(2): 22-36. DOI: 10.22363/2521-442X-2021-5-2-22-36

Peluso M. 2021. The functional approach, semiotics and professional discourse. Training, Language and Culture, 5(2): 62-72. DOI: 10.22363/2521-442X-2021-5-2-62-72

Sibul V. 2017. Psycholinguistic analysis of lexical-semantic structure in linguistic consciousness of Russian, English and German native speakers. Training, Language and Culture, 1(2): 54-70. DOI: 10.29366/2017tlc.1.2.4


Abstract views: 162

Share

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Madinyan, E. I. (2022). Lexical-Semantic Field "Moving Forward" in English Business Discourse. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 40(4), 520-533. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2021-40-4-520-533

Issue

Section

Linguistics