Representation of Suggestive Evidentiality in Political Mass Media-Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2022-41-4-733-746Keywords:
political discourse, suggestive evidentiality, authoritarian evidentiality, psychological evidence, author, reader, linguosynergeticsAbstract
The relevance of the research is determined by the importance of identifying and describing the evidentiary semantics formed by the author in the process of transmitting information in a discursive evidentiary context, as well as the insufficient study of evidence in this perspective. The purpose of the study is to determine the role of suggestibility in the transmission of deliberate dominance of political discourse in the media. The linguosynergic method of eudential analysis was used, which revealed additional multimodal semantics along with the main meaning of eudence, which suggests the qualification of the source of information about a particular event. As the results of the study show, the semantics of suggestive evidence corresponds to the multimodal semantics characteristic of the political discourse of the media. It was concluded that suggestive evidence reflects their deliberate dominance based on persuasion and prompting the reader to act, as well as on presenting the facts in a certain light. At the same time, the predominance of psychological evidence (53.8% of examples) over authoritative evidence (46.2% of examples) is due to the broader semantics of the first subspecies of the category, suggesting an impact on both the area of consciousness and the subconscious of the reader, in contrast to the authoritarian subspecies, characterized by the categorical and imperative influence of the author on the consciousness of the final addressee.
References
Список источников
Clear. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. Available at: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/clear (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Evidence. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. Available at: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/evidence (accessed: June 15, 2022).
For one’s sake. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. Available at: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/for-the-sake-of-somebody-something (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Give a speech. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/speech (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Hold. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/hold (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Hope. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/hope (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Important. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/important (accessed: June 15, 2022).
In sight. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/in-sight (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Joe Biden’s voting rights push is futile. 2022. In: The Economist. URL: https://www.economist.com/united-states/joe-bidens-voting-rights-push-is-futile-and-misguided/21807230 (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Reason. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/reason (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Seem. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/seem (accessed: June 15, 2022).
The parable of Boris Johnson. 2022. In: The Economist. URL: https://www. economist.com/leaders/2022/01/22/the-parable-of-boris-johnson (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Warn. 2022. In: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. URL: https://www. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/warn (accessed: June 15, 2022).
Список литературы
Астахова Т.Н. 2018. Корпусное исследование предложных групп с эвиденциальным значением «пересказывательность» в прессе Германии. Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация, 2(16): 48–56. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7935-2018-16-2-48-56.
Борботько В.Г. 2011. Принципы формирования дискурса: от психолингвистики
к лингвосинергетике. М., Либроком, 288 с.
Дускаева Л.Р. 2014. Журналистский дискурс в аспекте речевых жанров. Жанры речи, 1-2(9-10): 50–57. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2014-1-2-9-10-50-57.
Иванова С.В. 2017. Дискурсивная адаптация культурно-обусловленных языковых знаков
в политическом дискурсе СМИ (на материале политического массмедийного дискурса США). Политическая лингвистика, 1(61): 41–52.
Клеменова Е.Н., Кудряшов И.А. 2016. Персуазивная функция масс-медийных текстов: эвиденциальность и эпистемическая модальность. Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология, 6(15): 93–99.
Козловский Д.В. 2021. Особенности взаимодействия модусной категории «эвиденциальность»
с категориями «авторизация» и «аппроксимация» в дискурсивном пространстве массмедиа. Вестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология, 4(27): 122–130. DOI: 10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-4-122-130.
Лунина Т.П. 2020. О средствах выражения косвенной эвиденциальности в русском языке. Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета, 5(148): 92–97.
Никонова Е.А. 2022. Реализация категории эвиденциональности в аналитической статье англоязычной качественной прессы. Научный диалог, 1(11): 67–83. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-1-67-83.
Шибаева Л.В. 2000. Жанры в теории и практики журналистики. RELGA, 17(47). URL: http://www.relga.ru/Environ/WebObjects/tgu-www.woa/wa/Main?textid=1434&level1 =main&level2=articles (дата обращения: 15.06.2022).
Шмелева Т.В. 2010-2012. Медийное речеведение. URL : http://www.novsu.ru/file/1145792 (дата обращения: 15.06.2022).
Murray S.E. 2011. A Hamblin Semantics for Evidentials. In: Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIX (2009). Eds. E. Cormany, S. Ito, D. Lutz. Ithaca, NY, CLC Publications: 324–341.
Nuckolls J., Michael L. 2012. Evidential strategies in interactional and socio-cultural context. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2): 181–188. DOI: 10.1075/ps.3.2.03int.
Peterson T. 2010. Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Vancouver, BC, University of British Columbia, 301 p. DOI: 10.14288/1.0069730.
Söderqvist E.B. 2017. Evidentiality across age and gender: a corpus-based study of variation in spoken British English. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 5: 17–33. DOI: 10.32714/ricl.05.02.
Speas P. 2010. Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In: Edges, heads, and projections: Interface properties. Eds. A.M. Sciullo, V. Hill. Amsterdam, Benjamins: 127–150. DOI: 10.1075/la.156.10spe.
Squartini M. 2008. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics, 46–5: 917–947. DOI: 10.1515/LING.2008.030.
Abstract views: 79
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Дмитрий Валентинович Козловский
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
