On the Discursive Nature of the Proper Name
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2023-42-3-556-565Keywords:
proper name, discursive onomastics, discursive theory, discursive experiment, onym, text, discourseAbstract
The discursive approach focuses the attention on the speech-thinking activity of a perceiving subject, and the proper name itself is considered not just as a collapsed text, but a compression of many texts forming the discursive field of the onym. The name contains a multi-layered information that forms the proper name’s discourse and it can be identified through the discursive experiment. This experiment included 3 stages. The 1t stage allowed us to model the associative field of the onym and identify the mechanisms producing associations. They are phonetic, derivational, paradigmatic and syntagmatic mechanisms. At the 2nd stage, statements of a contact nature (dialogues) were received. The statements deploy in the fields, connected with the cognitive activity of recipients: the field of events, the field of background knowledge, the field of estimation and the field of attribution. The 3d stage of the experiment was connected with the modeling of non-contact speech acts (monologues) of an onymic nature. The received texts of fantasy nature were divided into 4 groups: 1) text-assumption; 2) text-association; 3) text-knowledge; 4) text-pragmatics.
References
Караулов Ю.Н. 1993. Ассоциативная грамматика русского языка. Москва, Русский язык, 330 с.
Куликова Л.В. 2015. Дискурсивные практики современной институциональной коммуникации. Под ред. Л.В. Куликовой. Красноярск, Сибирский федеральный университет: 6−8.
Красных В.В. 2002. Этнопсихолингвистика и лингвокультурология. Москва, Гнозис, 284 с.
Леонтьев А.Н. 1977. Деятельность. Сознание. Личность. Москва, Политиздат, 304 с.
Мурзин Л.Н., Штерн А.С. 1991. Текст и его восприятие. Свердловск, Издательство Уральского ун-та, 172 с.
Позднякова Е.Ю. 2021. К вопросу о дискурсивной теории ономастики. Культура и текст, 1 (44): 245−261. DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2021-1-245-261
Степыкин Н.И. 2021. Речевое действие как психолингвистический механизм порождения и актуализации смысла. Дис. … докт. филол. наук. Москва, 437 с.
Чернявская В.Е. 2007. Текст в когнитивно-дискурсивной парадигме: к вопросу о градуальном характере текстуальности. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований, 3(1): 303−314.
Abstract views: 65
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Елена Юрьевна Позднякова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.