Lexico-Stylistic Flavor of the East in the Linguistic Images of A.S. Pushkin

Authors

  • Shamsuddin Piavrai Belgorod National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2023-42-2-367-376

Keywords:

языковая образность, Восток, А.С. Пушкин, символ, дискурсивно-модусный концепт, внутренняя форма образного слова, когнитивная метафора, когнитивный эпитет

Abstract

Linguistic images of the East by A.S. Pushkin are distinguished by their unique linguocultural plasticity, combining (a) cultural and historical reality, (b) cognitive metaphor, (c) the author’s subjective-evaluative interpretation of a communicative event, (d) reflecting the lexico-stylistic flavor of the East. Onomastic and common orientalisms are considered as a type of lexical borrowings. It is proved that borrowed orientalisms serve not only to eliminate ethnocultural lacunae, but also to create the lexical and stylistic architectonics of the text, its expressive tone and aesthetic perception. In addition, oriental representations of oriental images serve as chronotopic markers, figurative marks indicating the time and place of the corresponding communicative events. The main idea of the study is the idea that linguistic images representing the picture of the world of the East serve not only as a means of banal description of the traditions, life and customs of lyrical heroes, but (and this is their main purpose) as a way of comprehending ethnic consciousness, mental attitude and the value-semantic framework of the eastern mentality.

Author Biography

Shamsuddin Piavrai, Belgorod National Research University

Postgraduate Student, Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Pedagogical Institute, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

References

Алефиренко Н.Ф., Нуртазина М.Б. 2018. Метафорический дискурс: в поисках сущности речевой образности. Cuadernos de Rusística Española, 14: 49–64.

Алефиренко Н.Ф., Нуртазина М.Б., Стебунова К.К. 2021б. В поисках когнитивно-лингвистической методологии учения о дискурсе. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература, 18(2): 313–338. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2021.205

Алефиренко Н.Ф., Нуртазина М.Б., Шахпутова З.Х. 2021а. Автохтонная синергия русского художественного дискурса. Русистика, 19 (3): 253–270. DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-3-253-270

Брагинский И.С. 1966. Заметки о западно-восточном синтезе в лирике Пушкина. Народы Азии и Африки, 4: 139–146.

Лицзюнь Г. Ментальные стереотипы в межкультурной коммуникации. Язык. Словесность. Культура, 4: 82–93.

Нольман М.Л. 1967. Западно-восточный синтез в произведениях Пушкина и его реалистическая основа. Народы Азии и Африки, 4: 116–126.

Пушкин А.С. 1985. Сочинения в трех томах. Том 1. М., Художественная литература, 735 с.

Томашевский Б.В. 1977. Примечания. В кн.: Пушкин А. С. Полное собрание сочинений: в 10-ти т. Т. 2. Стихотворения, 1820–1826. Л., Наука, Ленингр. отделение: 353–389.

Alefirenko N., Gigolayeva A., Dekhnich O., Chumak-Zhun’ I. 2019. Discursive-Pragmatic Modeling of the Language Image. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21): 142–149 (in Spain).

Alefirenko N., Nurtazina M., Shakhputova Z. 2020. Linguistic Episteme as a Discourse-Generating Mechanism of Speech Activity. Utopía y praxis latinoamericana, 25: 438–463 (in Spain). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4280198

Benton M.A. 2016. Knowledge and evidence you should have had. Episteme. a Journal of individual and social epistemology, 13(4): 471–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2016.33

Bueno O. 2017. Thinking about Science, reflecting on Art: Bringing Aesthetics and Philosophy of Science Together. Eds. G. Daby, S. French, D. Rickles. London, Routledge, 202 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315114927

Buzan T., Griffiths C., Harrison J. 2012. Modern Mind Mapping for Smarter Thinking. Buzan T., Griffiths C., Harrison J. 2012. Modern Mind Mapping for Smarter Thinking. Cardiff, Proactive Press, 181 p.

Cash T.F. 2012. Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body image. In: Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance. Ed. T.F. Cash. London, UK, and San Diego, CA, Academic Press (Elsevier): 334–342.

Chomsky N. 2006. Language and Mind. United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York, 209 p.

Cuddy A., Fiske S., Kwan V., Glick P., Demoulin S., Leyens Ja., Bond M., Croizet Je., Ellemers N., Sleebos Ed, Htun T., Kim H., Maio G., Perry Ju., Petkova K., Todorov V., Rodríguez-Bailón R., Morales E., Moya M., Palacios M., Smith V., Perez R., Vala J., Ziegler R. 2009. Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1): 1-33. DOI: 10.1348/014466608X314935

Davis W. 2003. Meaning, expression, and thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 654 р.

Edensor T. 2002. National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Oxford and New York, Berg, 224 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781003086178

Eliade М. 1977. Study 7. Metaphor and reference. In: Ricoeur P. The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. Translation from french by R. Czerny, K. McLaughlin and J. Costello. London and New York: 255–302. (Ricoeur P. 1975. La métaphore vive. Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 413 р. DOI: 10.7202/500412ar)

Fokkema D.W. 1986. The Semantic & Syntactic Organisation of Postmodern Texts. In: Approaching Postmodernism. Papers presented at a Workshop on Postmodernism, 21–23 September 1984, University of Utrecht. Eds. D.W. Fokkema, H. Bertens. Philadelphia, Univ. of Utrecht Press: 81–98. DOI: 10.1075/upal.21.05fok

Forrester M. 2002. Psychology of the Image. London, Routledge, 180 p.

Jackendoff R. 2012. A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 288 p.

Juan V.S., Astington Ja. 2017. Does language matter for implicit theory of mind? The effects of epistemic verb training on implicit and explicit false-belief understanding. Cognitive development, 41: 19-32. DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.12.003

Kristeva J. 1984. Revolution in poetic Language, N.Y., Columbia Univ. Press, 271 p.

Larson R.K. & Segal G.M.A. 1995. Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 662 p.

Paivio A. 1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 596 p.

Schwartz S.H. 2003. A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations. Chapter 7. In: Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem: 259–319.

Sims A. 2016. A problem of scope for the free energy principle as a theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 29(7): 967–980. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2016.1200024

Spaulding S. 2018. Mindreading beyond belief: A more comprehensive conception of how we understand others. Philosophy compass, 13(11): e12526. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12526


Abstract views: 94

Share

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Piavrai, S. (2023). Lexico-Stylistic Flavor of the East in the Linguistic Images of A.S. Pushkin. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 42(2), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2023-42-2-367-376

Issue

Section

Linguistics