Religious Vocabulary as Means of Creating a Linguistic Image in the Works of T. Oleinikova

Authors

  • Natalya M. Goleva Belgorod State National Research University
  • Ella M. Levina Belgorod State National Research University
  • Ekaterina M. Yakimova Belgorod State National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2024-43-1-90-98

Keywords:

language image, poetic text, metaphor, epithet, personification, comparisons

Abstract

The authors consider religionyms as significant elements of semantic structure of a poetic text. The research is based on the regional Belgorod poetic material which is nowadays poorly explored. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of functioning of religious vocabulary as a means of creating linguistic images in the T. Oleynikova’s poetry. Frequently used relionyms such as temple, dome, icon, bell, prayer are described, which realize their semantic potential in the text space. It is shown that religionyms, forming a thematic unity, are capable of conceptualizing reality and acting as a means of creating linguistic images in a poetic text. As a result of the study, it was established that religionyms represent linguistic images such as faith, family, love, hope that are culturally close. It is concluded that interconnected linguistic images created with the help of religious names reflect author’s vision and constitute T. Oleinikova’s linguistic world view. The results obtained contribute to the study of regional poetic discourse and deepen understanding of the specific functioning of the religious vocabulary in poetic space, reflect features of the writer’s religious worldview, and contribute to solving a number of problems in the field of the author’s idiolect.

Author Biographies

Natalya M. Goleva, Belgorod State National Research University

Candidate of Philological Science, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia.

Ella M. Levina, Belgorod State National Research University

Candidate of Philological Science, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia.

Ekaterina M. Yakimova, Belgorod State National Research University

Candidate of Philological Science, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Russian Literature, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia.

References

Алефиренко Н.Ф. 2016. Дискурс в свете нейрокогнитивистики. Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки, 7(228): 5−14.

Алефиренко Н.Ф. 2021. Языковые образы как единицы этнокультурного сознания. Гуманитарные исследования, 4(80): 10−18. DOI: 10.21672/1818-4936-2021-80-4-010-018

Арутюнова Н.Д. 1999. Язык и мир человека.Москва, Языки русской культуры, 913 с.

Гаспаров Б.М. 1996. Язык, память, образ. Лингвистика языкового существования. Москва, Новое литературное обозрение, 352 с.

Голева Н.М., Левина Э.М., Якимова Е.М. 2021. Образный потенциал религионима КРЕСТ в поэзии Т. Олейниковой. В кн.: Языковые образы: лингвокультурные символы этнокультурной духовности. Сборник научных трудов по итогам 5-й Международной научной конференции, посвященной 75-летию Заслуженного деятеля науки Российской Федерации, доктора филологических наук, профессора Н.Ф. Алефиренко (Белгород, 17–19 сентября 2021 года). Под ред. Н.Ф. Алефиренко, И.И. Чумак-Жунь, К.К. Ли. Белгород, Эпицентр: 217−222.

Караулов Ю.Н. 2019. Русский язык и языковая личность. Москва, URSS, 264 с.

Ковшова М.В., Гудков Д.Б. 2017. Словарь лингвокультурологических терминов. Москва: Флинта. 192 с.

Маслова В.А. 2014. Когнитивный и коммуникативный аспекты художественного текста. Витебск: ВГУ им. П.М. Машерова. 104 с.

Скляревская Г.Н. 2021. Лексикография на службе лингвокультурологии: описание религиозной лексики в словаре русского языка ХХI века. Когнитивные исследования языка, 2(45): 624−631.

Стернин И.А., Розенфельд М.Я. 2015. Слово и образ. Под ред. И.А. Стернина. Москва−Берлин, Директ-Медиа, 398 с. DOI: 10.23681/375699.

Токарев Г.В. 2020. Словарь лингвокультурологических терминов. Тула, Тульское производственное полиграфическое объединение, 57 с.

Харченко В.К. 2021. Переносная семантика слова. Москва, ЛИБРОКОМ, URSS, 198 с.

Юрина Е.А. 2005. Образный строй языка. Томск, Издательство Томского университета, 156 с.

Gibbs R.W., Colston H.L. 2012. Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge,Publ.Cambridge University Press, 384 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139168779

Glucksberg S. 2001. Understanding Figurative language: from metaphors to idioms. Publ. Oxford University Press, 144 p.

Johnson-Laird P.N. 1983. Images, propositions, and models. In: Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, Publ. Cambridge University: 146−166.

Kovecses Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling.Cambridge, Publ. Cambridge University Press, 223 p.

Kovecses Z. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge, Publ. Cambridge University Press, 314 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408

Langacker R. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin and New York, Publ. Mouton de Gruyter, 395 p.


Abstract views: 67

Share

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Goleva, N. M., Levina, E. M., & Yakimova, E. M. (2024). Religious Vocabulary as Means of Creating a Linguistic Image in the Works of T. Oleinikova. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 43(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2024-43-1-90-98

Issue

Section

Linguistics