The Potential of Using the Singapore Teaching Practice in Training Future Language Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2025-44-4-706-717Keywords:
Singapore teaching practice, educational process, critical thinking, problem-based learningAbstract
The purpose of this work is to identify the potential of using the Singapore teaching methodology in the professional training of future language teachers. The authors analyze various elements of the Singapore practice, including structured interactions (“Think-Pair-Share”, “Round Robin”), visual organizers (“Mind Map”), the method of active knowledge verification (“Numbered Heads Together”), as well as techniques such as “Gallery Walk”, “Talking Chips”, “Exit Ticket”, and “Fishbowl”. The study examines the impact of these methods on the development of active learning skills, critical thinking, creativity, communication abilities, teamwork skills, and presentation skills among future teachers. The article presents specific examples of applying the Singapore methodology in the study and analysis of literary works, the development of theoretical foundations for teaching and learning Russian language and literature, the organization of project activities, and the reflection of the educational process. The results of the study demonstrate that the Singapore teaching practice creates an interactive and stimulating educational environment, turning students into active participants in the learning process. It is revealed that, despite the need for additional planning efforts by the teacher, this approach is justified, as it forms highly qualified specialists who are ready for innovation and effective teaching of Russian language and literature in the modern educational environment.
References
Список литературы
Алишев Т.Б., Гильмутдинов А.Х., 2010. Опыт Сингапура: создание образовательной системы мирового уровня. Вопросы образования, 4: 227–246.
Выготский Л.С. 1999. Педагогическая психология. Москва, Педагогика-пресс, 533 с.
Галиахметова А.Т. 2017. Интеграция сингапурских обучающих структур и современных педагогических технологий в образовательной организации. Вестник Казанского государственного энергетического университета, 3(35): 110–119.
Данилова Л.Н. 2018. Образовательное лидерство Сингапура как социокультурный феномен. Ярославский педагогический вестник, 3: 55–62. DOI: 10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10067
Дьюи Дж. 2000. Демократия и образование. Пер. с англ. Ю. Турчаниновой, Э.Н. Гусинского,
Н.Н. Михайлова. Москва, Педагогика-пресс, 382 с. (Dewey J. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan, 434 p.)
Дьяченко В.К. 2004. Коллективный способ обучения: Дидактика в диалогах. Москва, Народное образование, 348 с.
Кофейникова Ю.Л. 2016. Психологическая природа сотрудничества как формы контекстного образования. Педагогика и психология образования, 2: 92–99.
Мосина М.А., Жданова С.А. 2019. Использование сингапурской методики для развития умений
века. Проблемы романо-германской филологии, педагогики и методики преподавания иностранных языков, 15: 110–114.
Пассов Е.И. 2000. Программа-концепция коммуникативного иноязычного образования: концепция развития индивидуальности в диалоге культур. Москва, Просвещение, 172 с.
Почекаева И.С., Сысоева Т.А. 2024. Сингапурская методика и ее эффективное применение на уроках иностранного языка. Проблемы романо-германской филологии, педагогики и методики преподавания иностранных языков, 20: 207–213.
Салтыкова М.В. 2017. Использование сингапурской методики обучения английскому языку в поликультурной группе. Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация, 4: С. 159-162.
Фирюлина Н.В. 2018. Формы и методы педагогического сотрудничества: сингапурская методика. Научно-методический электронный журнал «Концепт», V4: 65–73. DOI: 10.24422/MCITO.2018.V4.12403
Ширяева И.В., Трубецких М.А. 2022. Опыт внедрения кооперативного метода обучения Спенсера Кагана на уроках английского языка. Молодой ученый, 25(420-5): 343–348. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/420/93317
Ялышева А.А. 2014. "Сингапурская" методика обучения: из опыта работы учителя английского языка Сингапурская методика обучения. Английский язык в школе, 4(48): 7–12.
Ankur J., Saket K., Satish Ch., Pal D.K. 2015. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4): 396–403. DOI: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Bar-On R. 2006. The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18 Suppl: 13–25.
Goreyshi M.K., Kargar F.R., Noohi Sh., Ajilchi B. 2013. Effect of Combined Mastery-Cooperative Learning on Emotional Intelligence, Self-esteem and Academic Achievement in Grade Skipping. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 84: 470–474.
Kagan S. 2001. Kagan Structures for Emotional Intelligence. Kagan Online Magazine, URL: https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/278/Kagan-Structures-for-Emotional-Intelligence (accessed: September 19, 2025)
Kagan S. 2003. Addressing the Life Skills Crisis. Kagan Online Magazine. URL: https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/257/Addressing-the-Life-Skills-Crisis (accessed: September 19, 2025)
References
Alishev T.B., Gil'mutdinov A.Kh., 2010. Opyt Singapura: sozdanie obrazovatel'noi sistemy mirovogo urovnya [The Singapore experience: creating a world-class educational system]. Educational studies Moscow, 4: 227–246.
Vygotskii L.S. 1999. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical Psychology]. Moscow, Publ. Pedagogika-press, 533 p.
Galiakhmetova A.T. 2017. Integration of Singap Ore Training Structures and Modern Pedagogical Technologies in Educational Organization. Kazan State Power Engineering University Bulletin, 3(35): 110–119 (in Russian).
Danilova L.N. 2018. Educational Leadership of Singapore as a Sociocultural Phenomen. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 3: 55–62 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10067
D'yui Dzh. 2000. Demokratiya i obrazovanie [Democracy and Education]. Per. from engl.
Yu. Turchaninovf, E.N. Gusinsky, N.N. Mikhailov. Moscow, Publ. Pedagogika-press, 382 p. (Dewey J. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan, 434 p.)
D'yachenko V.K. 2004. Kollektivnyi sposob obucheniya: Didaktika v dialogakh [Collective Method of Teaching: Didactics in Dialogues]. Moscow, Publ. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 348 p.
Kofeinikova Yu.L. 2016. Psychological nature of collaboration as a form of contextual education. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2: 92–99 (in Russian).
Mosina M., Zhdanova S. 2019. Using the Singapore Method Developing the 21st Century Skills. Problemy romano-germanskoi filologii, pedagogiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov, 15: 110–114.
Passov E.I. 2000. Programma-kontseptsiya kommunikativnogo inoyazychnogo obrazovaniya: kontseptsiya razvitiya individual'nosti v dialoge kul'tur [The program-concept of communicative foreign language education: the concept of individuality development in the dialogue of cultures]. Moscow, Publ. Prosveshchenie, 172 p.
Pochekaeva I., Sysoeva T. 2024. Singapore Methodology and its Effective Application in Foreign Language Lessons. Problemy romano-germanskoi filologii, pedagogiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov, 20: 207–213.
Saltykova M.V. 2017. Singapore Method of Teaching English as a Foreign Language in a Multicultural Group. Proceedings of Voronezh state university. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication. 4: pp. 159-162 (in Russian).
Firyulina N. 2018. Forms and methods of pedagogical cooperation: Singapore methodology. Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept», V4: 65–73. DOI: 10.24422/MCITO.2018.V4.12403
Shiryaeva I.V., Trubetskikh M.A. 2022. Opyt vnedreniya kooperativnogo metoda obucheniya Spensera Kagana na urokakh angliiskogo yazyka [Experience of implementing Spencer Kagan's cooperative learning method in English lessons]. Young Scientist, 25(420-5): 343–348. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/420/93317
Yalysheva A.A. 2014. "Singapurskaya" metodika obucheniya: iz opyta raboty uchitelya angliiskogo yazyka Singapurskaya metodika obucheniya ["Singapore" teaching method: from the experience of an English teacher. Singapore teaching method]. English at school, 4(48): 7–12.
Ankur J., Saket K., Satish Ch., Pal D.K. 2015. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4): pp. 396-403. DOI: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Bar-On R. 2006. The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18 Suppl: 13-25.
Goreyshi M.K., Kargar F.R., Noohi Sh., Ajilchi B. 2013. Effect of Combined Mastery-Cooperative Learning on Emotional Intelligence, Self-esteem and Academic Achievement in Grade Skipping. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science. 84: pp. 470-474.
Kagan S. 2001. Kagan Structures for Emotional Intelligence. Kagan Online Magazine. – URL: https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/278/Kagan-Structures-for-Emotional-Intelligence (accessed: September 19, 2025)
Kagan S. 2003. Addressing the Life Skills Crisis. Kagan Online Magazine. – URL: https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/257/Addressing-the-Life-Skills-Crisis (accessed: September 19, 2025)
Abstract views: 0
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Надежда Александровна Асташова, Данила Иванович Торопыно

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
