The Ideology of Limited Subjectivity in Writings of Modern Russian Publicists: Essence and Methods of Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2022-41-4-640-650Keywords:
Russian journalism, discourse, ideology, critical discourse analysis, contemporary art, cultural issues in Russian journalismAbstract
The article introduces the concept of “ideology of limited subjectness” into scientific circulation, gives the general parameters of this ideology, in the context of well-known socio-political and socio-psychological concepts. On the example of the publications of contemporary Russian authors, an attempt is made to show how the ideology of limited subjectivity realizes itself in texts devoted to issues of art. In particular, the role of the category of obligation, the paternalistic (caring and omnipotent) state, the moral approach to the interpretation of a work of art and the figure of its author, the moral duty to the collective or abstract Whole, the construction of the conflict of the great past and the degrading, chaotic present, the priority of collective identity over individual, as structures for the subordination of individual will (restriction of independent choice) to collective goals. In addition, it has been suggested that the ideology of limited choice realizes itself through an apology for the artistic direction of classical realism (in which the features of isolation, focus on "one's own", ethnocentrism, etc. are actualized). In addition, the author believes that perhaps one of the most effective tools for introducing the ideology of limited subjectivity is the authors' appeal to the art of socialist realism, within which their approval of the activities of large and small total collectives (from the state to the labor collective) is of great importance, as well as the concept of a collective personality is affirmed, fully realizing its potential within total collectives and the circumstances presented as an exemplary, standard of socio-political behavior.
References
Список источников
Семигин Г.Ю. 2010. Идеология. В кн.: Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. Том 2. Под ред. В.С. Стёпина, А.А. Гусейнова, Г.Ю. Семигина, А.П. Огурцова. М., Мысль, С. 81–83.
Сычева Л.А. 2004. Вожделения телеэлиты. Лидия Сычева: проза, критика, публицистика. URL: https://lsycheva.ru/books/culture/culture_2988.html (дата обращения: 01.11.2022).
Сычева Л.А. 2005. В плену у биороботов. Лидия Сычева: проза, критика, публицистика. URL: https://lsycheva.ru/books/culture/culture_58.html (дата обращения: 05.11.2022).
Сычева Л.А. 2010. Будущее художественного слова. Лидия Сычева: проза, критика, публицистика. URL: https://lsycheva.ru/books/culture/culture_3668.html (дата обращения: 06.11.2022).
Сычева Л.А. 2018. Банкирский шик иль воинский гранит? Московский комсомолец, 2018, 25 августа, № 27766. Лидия Сычева: проза, критика, публицистика. URL: https://lsycheva.ru/books/journalism/journalism_8797.html (дата обращения: 07.11.2022).
Сычева Л.А. 2019. Больше чем музыка. Молоко, 11. Лидия Сычева: проза, критика, публицистика https://lsycheva.ru/books/culture/culture_9537.html (дата обращения: 08.11.2022).
Список литературы
Дейк ван Тён А. 2013. Дискурс и власть: Репрезентация доминирования в языке и коммуникации. Пер. с англ. Е.А. Кожемякина, Е.В. Переверзева, А.М. Аматова. М., Книжный дом «Либроком», 344 с. (Teun A. van Dijk. 2008. Discourse and Power. Macmillan Education UK, 308 p.).
Меринов В.Ю. 2016. «Сквозь магический кристалл»: карикатура и карикатуризация реальности в советской центральной прессе 1920-х годов (на примере газеты «Правда»). Научный результат. Социальные и гуманитарные исследования, 2-4(10): 27–39. DOI: 10.18413/2408-932X-2016-2-4-27-39.
Abstract views: 65
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Валерий Юрьевич Меринов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.