Philological Knowledge and Philological Analysis as Part of the Memory Studies Research Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2023-42-2-349-357Keywords:
literary artistic text, global philological context, vertical context, philological background knowledge, Shakespeare, allegory, Memory Studies, social-historical implicationsAbstract
Within the Memory Studies research area the use of the philological approach occupies a lacuna position due to the actual absence of analytical works devoted to this issue, which determines the relevance of the study in question as well as its theoretical and scientific-practical significance. The purpose of the investigation is to establish the validity of the philological analysis methods application to the study of literary works in terms of its results expansion into the Memory Studies research field, with special attention to the social and historical significance of events that serve as an impetus for artistic text creation. The methodological basis of the research deals with complex approach to the analysis of the artistic text, which includes the use of methods obtained as the result of philological knowledge development as referred to vertical and global philological context issues. This concerns creative techniques and strategies implementation, as well as the process of penetration into socio-historical and worldview phenomena, characteristic of the given historical period, along with a certain literary tradition. In the course of the investigation we may come to the conclusion that the philological basis of the work by William Shakespeare under consideration is an allegory containing a large number of social and historical implications. The results obtained enable the researcher to use them both as the stimulus for further philological studies as well as the basis for the investigation within the Memory studies research field.
References
Akhmanova O.S., Gyubbenet I.V. 1977. «Vertikal'nyy kontekst» kak filologicheskaya problema ["Vertical context" as a philological problem]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 3: 47–54.
Ахманова О.С., Гюббенет И.В. 1977. «Вертикальный контекст» как филологическая проблема. Вопросы языкознания, 3: 47–54.
Assman Ya. 2004. Kul'turnaya pamyat': pis'mo, pamyat' o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost' v vysokikh kul'turakh drevnosti [Cultural memory and early civilization. Writing, remembrance, and political imagination]. M., Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury [The languages of the Slavic culture], 368. (Assman J. 1992. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Beck, München, 344)
Vishnyakova O.D., Lipgart A.A., Martyushova N.O. 2022. The Study of Memory in Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 41(4): 700–706 (in Russian). DOI: 10.52575/2712-7451-2022-41-4-700-706
Вишнякова О.Д., Липгарт А.А., Мартюшова Н.О. 2022. Проблема исследования памяти в лингвистике: междисциплинарный подход. Вопросы журналистики, педагогики, языкознания, 41(4): 700–706. DOI: 10.52575/2712-7451-2022-41-4-700-706
Vishnyakova O.D., Martyushova N.O. 2022. Past events collective memory in linguistic perspective: case-study of the British royal family speeches. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 8(3): 3-19. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-3-0-1
Вишнякова О.Д., Мартюшова Н.О. 2022. Коллективная память о прошедших событиях в лингвистическом освещении: опыт анализа речей членов королевской семьи Великобритании.
Научный результат. Вопросы теоретической и прикладной лингвистики. 8(3): 3-19. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-3-0-1
Lipgart A.A. 2018. On interpreting some facts of william shakespeare’s life and works: "The phoenix and the turtle" and the purchase of real estate in London. Stephanos, 2(28): 110-129 (in Russia). DOI: 10.24249/2309-9917-2018-28-2-110-129
Липгарт А.А. 2018. К проблеме интерпретации фактов жизни и творчества Уильяма Шекспира: поэма «Феникс и Голубь» и покупка недвижимости в Лондоне. Stephanos, 2(28): 110–129. DOI: 10.24249/2309-9917-2018-28-2-110-129
Likhachev D.S. 1989. O filologii [About philology]. M., Publ. Vysshaya shkola, 208 p.
Лихачев Д.С. 1989. О филологии. М., Высшая школа, 208 с.
Prokhorova O.N., Chekulay I.V., Bagana Zh., Kuprieva I.A., Sapronova E.A. 2012. The problem of cognition process reflection in the language sphere: conceptual basis research. Scientific bulletin of Belgorod State University. Humanities Sciences, 24(16): 104–110.
Прохорова О.Н., Чекулай И.В., Багана Ж., Куприева И.А., Сапронова Е.А. 2012. Отражение процесса познания в языке: в поисках концептуальных оснований. Научные ведомости Белогродского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки, 24(16): 104–110.
Abrams M.H. 2012. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. Eds. S. Greenblatt, C.T. Christ, & 12 más. New York, London, W.W. Norton & Company, 3078 p.
Asquith C. 2005. Shadowplay: The Hidden Beliefs and Coded Politics of William Shakespeare. New York, PublicAffairs, 368 p.
Asquith C. 2018. Shakespeare and the Resistance: the Earl of Southampton, the Essex Rebellion, and the Poems That Challenged Tudor Tyranny. New York, PublicAffairs, 288 p.
Confino A. 1997. Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method. American Historical Review, 102(5): 1386–1403. DOI: 10.2307/2171069
Echterhoff G. 2008. Language and Memory: Social and Cognitive Processes. In: Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Eds. A. Erll, A. Nünning. Berlin, N.Y., De Gruyter: 263–274. DOI: 10.1515/9783110207262.4.263
Erll A., Nünning A. 2005. Where Literature and Memory Meet: Towards a Systematic Approach to the Concepts of Memory used in Literary Studies. In: Literature, Literary History and Cultural Memory. Vol. 21. Ed. by Herbert Grabes. Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen: 261–294.
Harvey P. 1967. The Oxford Companion to English Literature. Ed. P. Harvey. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 961 p.
Kansteiner W. 2002. Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and theory, 41(2): 179–197. DOI: 10.1111/0018-2656.00198
Kastan D.S. 2014. A Will to Believe: Shakespeare and Religion. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 168 p.
Nelson K. 2003. Self and social function: Individual autobiographical memory and collective memory. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50(2): 296–319. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9330-6
Milward P. 1997. The Catholicism of Shakespeare’s Plays. Southampton, Saint Austin Press, 148 p.
Roediger H.L., Wertsch J.V. 2008. Creating a new discipline of memory studies. Memory Studies, 1(1): 9−22. DOI: 10.1177/1750698007083884
Shakespeare W. 2008. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Sonnets and Poems. Ed. by C. Burrow. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 768 p.
The Norton Anthology of Poetry. 2005. Eds. M. Ferguson, M.J. Salter, J. Stallworthy. New York, London, W.W. Norton & Company, 2182 p.
Vesey G., Foulkes P. 1990. Collins Dictionary of Philosophy. Harpercollins Publishers (Harper Collins), Glasgow, Great Britain, 300 p.
Wilson R. 2004. Secret Shakespeare: Studies in Theatre, Religion and Resistance. Manchester University Press, 326 p.
Abstract views: 46
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Андрей Александрович Липгарт, Ольга Дмитриевна Вишнякова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
